1Mo·

Capital magazine tested 39 robo-advisors in the period June 22 - June 24. None of them were able to beat the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100 or MSCI World in this period. ETFs performed much better and are significantly cheaper. These advisors performed similarly poorly in the last test.


For comparison (12-month average June 22 - June 24)

+23.8% Nasdaq 100

+17.1% MSCI World

+14.2% S&P 500


Many advisors were not even able to beat inflation during the test period. Big promises, high fees and nothing behind them. ETFs win.

>> What experiences have you already had with robo-advisors? Opinions?


$IWDA (+0,27 %)
$CSPX (+0,32 %)
$CSNDX (+0,34 %)
$EI (+0,3 %)#etf
#etfs
#roboadvisor

attachment
10
6 Commentaires

image de profil
I have been saving with Gerd Kommer Capital's Robo-Advisor since May of this year. I don't know how it will perform in the long term, but I've achieved a return of 5.47% so far. Costs are already factored out. I'm letting it run for now and have no stress.
However, it does not invest in individual shares but in many ETFs. I have chosen a weighting of 80/20.

Let's see how it develops.

Greetings
Carsten
5
Voir toutes les 4 autres réponses
As far as I know, robo advisors are not created to beat any index. Just to introduce people to the investment.

So, I'm not sure if comparing apples with pears makes any sense. Maybe only to the staff of some magazines.
Participez à la conversation