9Mo·

I was just wondering whether it would make more sense for me to use the MSCI World SRI ($SUSW (+0,39 %)) it would make more sense for me to use the MSCI World ESG Screened ($SAWD (+0,42 %)), as this does not exclude as many companies as the SRI.

It's a bit stupid when companies like Apple, Amazon, Google and the like are missing from your investment for whatever reason.


The ESG Screened is very close to the normal MSCI World, only at a lower share price and therefore not so much money remains in the clearing account for one-off purchases in between ;-)


The difference within the last year was also not entirely without...

4
32 Commentaires

image de profil
Just as a thought experiment: how about an ordinary, inexpensive MSCI World?
20
Voir toutes les 12 autres réponses
image de profil
LU1781541179
$LCUW

A €16 MSCI World ETF with a very low TER and a large fund volume.

I also use this as a world ETF.

Should solve your problems 👍🏼
2
Voir toutes les 3 autres réponses
But you do know that the TER tells you what the ETF costs you, right?
How many euros a share in an ETF costs is completely irrelevant
2
Afficher la réponse
I am very satisfied with the SRI. I also have the EM SRI.
2
image de profil
Are there any companies in the ESG that you didn't want at all?
Just put them in relation to Apple, Google and the like.
1
Voir toutes les 4 autres réponses
image de profil
I understand your reasons and that's why I switched to ESG!
1
Afficher la réponse
image de profil
Do you really want to have environmentally friendly screening, or is it just a coincidence?
Voir toutes les 4 autres réponses
Participez à la conversation