image de profil
What do you want with Unilever, Coca-Cola, Pfizer, DHL, especially at your age? Unfortunately, their performance is simply subterranean. Of course, these are multi-billion dollar corporations with a stable business model and decent profits. But these companies are already more or less "grown up", there are no more high growth rates. Accordingly, the share price is only going up a little. At 65, you can think about such companies for the stable cash flow.
6
image de profil
@Psychedelic_SunflowerThanks for the answer 👍 In principle, I can keep them in and then simply add growth shares. Or?
image de profil
@14JahreBWLer_Vaters_Sohn Hello, real high performers bet on the S&P500, Bitcoin or NASDAQ 100 up to the first 100k. Everything else makes no sense at your age.
image de profil
@Psychedelic_Sunflower I see it differently. You can also buy at a young age. I can think of worse things than having a Coca-Cola with a 15% personal dividend yield in 30 years' time.
7
image de profil
@DerMartin Just because Warren Buffet invested in CocaCola at the right time does not mean that it will continue to do so for the next 30 years. As has already been written above, the companies are "fully grown".
1
image de profil
@Einsteiger How do you know which share is "fully grown"?
I think the recent past has shown that anything is always possible.
But in the end, that's also the exciting thing about the securities market. We all have the same information and yet we often come to different conclusions.
I'm very happy with my Coca-Cola and I'm betting that it will give me a lot of pleasure for the next 15 years.
1
image de profil
@DerMartin What does the "personal dividend yield" tell you? It says nothing at all about the company. It only represents the difference between the entry price and the current dividend amount. However, this does not mean that you will receive more dividends or a better performance. Moreover, the dividends are always part of the total return.
1
image de profil
@DerMartin Yes, of course you can do that, but the returns including dividends of Unilever or Coca-Cola, for example, are far behind the returns of the MSCI World, let alone the many high-growth individual stocks that exist. What good is a Coca Cola share with a 15% personal dividend yield if I lose, say, 4% every year over 30 years?
And the share price of $KO is still doing relatively well, while it's better not to look at Unilever at all over the last 5 years.
1