image de profil
Why 2 ETFs each for the world and the dividend sector? Why the two sector ETFs with which you will never get off the ground in the long term, since logic alone dictates that one sector will never outperform the others over decades. It is a cyclical investment. But it's not a real return investment, so what are you hoping for?
1
image de profil
@General_T_Regnery the semiconductor ETF is still a leftover beginner's sin, where I hope for a little more performance. the world ETF is the all-world and for dividends I have not two, but three pieces. Namely, one is the high dividend yield. And I have 3 pieces because they pay out (currently and hopefully further) in such a way that I get a dividend every month.
image de profil
@RobertoNiemalsBlanco
Ok, thanks I see it now. It's just a world ETF. Why do you say sin, but at the same time hope for a return from your mistake? Have you learned nothing from it in the end and are just telling yourself a positive development regarding your investment behavior? It would be consistent if you see the sector ETF as a sin to treat it as such and to sell it as soon as possible to let your money work better for you. Regarding the dividend ETFs: But what would be the difference if you would receive, for example, instead of 10 times 100 € once 1000 € dividend? It comes down to the same thing. Unless you think you can only handle freely available money poorly and irrationally and then prefer to have your dividends paid out piecemeal out of self-protection...
image de profil
@General_T_Regnery on the former: i'm still hoping to get razs at plus/minus zero. 😄 And for the second you hit the nail on the head haha