Sebastian (@Sebastian24) sur getquin

1Mo·

Hello everyone,

somehow I can't quite make up my mind, $KO (-1,76 %) , $K (-0,26 %) , $ULVR (-0,87 %) , $PEP (-0,84 %) , , etc.

Doesn't it make sense to invest in an ETF $WCSS (-0,61 %) to have exposure to all these companies?

My idea is to strengthen my portfolio somewhat in the consumer staples sectors, as this area only covers 4% at the moment. There is a small dividend and the stocks are not quite as volatile.

Is there anything against it? Is anyone invested there?

Thanks for your feedback ✌️

12 Commentaires

Jelena@West-End-Girl

1Mo

With the ETF you naturally have less risk, volatility and expense, but the performance is catastrophic compared to equally boring and safe stocks such as Coca-Cola, Pepsi or Procter&Gamble.

•

ec3jr@ec3jr

1Mo

In my opinion or the way I manage my portfolio is that I only invest in individual stocks if I think the return would be greater than a etf. If I believe that a stock would be a great option I would put most of my funds there.

I try to have a ETF as my core position on my portfolio too.

•

Smudo@Smudeo

1Mo

If you look at the 4 stocks. +1.2% today the ETF is under 1% with the details then there are still dividends. So with an investment of 10,000 euros, 300-500 euros each year for the stocks, 200 euros for the ETF. You have the choice. Can also go in the other direction - minus, the individual stocks fall more in percentage terms

•

Ronald@AlterMann

1Mo

Um, have you been following the news on $K over the last few days?
I am invested in $KO $K and $ULVR and have a savings plan running everywhere

•

Afficher la réponse

Maximilian@Maximilian01

1Mo

Coca Cola no, hardly any growth possible if interest rates rise Invest in Unilever. EM is always hit harder than us. $BATS $ULVR $PG Cigarettes are always smoked and BAT has the largest share worldwide, in times of crisis e.g. war soldiers smoke a lot. In a recession too. Unilever is heavily invested in EM, good growth is still possible and PG is a long term runner

•