1Année
The decision to shift from World+EM to an All World is understandable, but that you compare the two ETFs with each other I find incomprehensible. The High Yield has only the stocks that pay dividends (no Amazon, Alphabet, Berkshire, etc.) and under 2000 values. The All World with over 4000 values represents 95% of the world economy. So with this ETF you have the market and accordingly the market return to which everyone measures and tries to beat. So these two are not comparable to each other in my opinion, especially if you shift from the two ETFs. If your goal is safe asset accumulation with market return, I would take $VWCE. It may be that the other outperfomend the times, but in the long run, the All World has the nose in front.
•
11
•
1Année
@Joris That's exactly what can't be said often enough! I really don't understand where the enthusiasm for the High Dividend Yield comes from - especially among people who are probably almost all in the asset accumulation phase. Do they all not understand the product?
•
11
•1Année
@randomdude I agree with you. Here the product is not understood and these are very simple Imvestementthemen. There is so much material what you can read through about ETFs, this difference must be recognizable here. Unfortunately, there is only looked at the dividend yield and are yes 1800 shares in it, will already go wrong. Now is the asset phase or how I still do it in dividend growth investing. So do not want to talk the high yield bad, but there I will pump part of my thausierer with 60 purely. Or maybe my divi growth has paid off so that I do not have to shift anything. Who knows.
•
11
•