~ (@Michael-official) sur getquin

6Mo·

Should the state invest in start-ups? 🔋

Some argue that government investment is necessary to promote growth and innovation in key sectors, while others have concerns about the efficiency and fairness of government intervention.

I believe that the state should invest in key technologies of the future such as eVTOL, AI, semiconductors and robotics.

Exciting alternatives to Volocopter:

$LILM (+4,41 %)

$EVTL

Basically, I find $AIR (+0,88 %) exciting.

In the end, Airbus will not miss out on this market if it becomes a business case at all.

https://m.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/unternehmen/volocopter-wissing-will-150-millionen-euro-fuer-flugtaxis-19610407.html

www.faz.netVolocopter: Wissing will 150 Millionen Euro für Flugtaxis

4 Commentaires

Philip@PhilT

6Mo

I have a start up for the government to fund $NTSCM No refunds

•

Beat The Bank@randomdude

6Mo

🤯

••

Stefan@gravetheart

6Mo

Wouldn't $EH already be much further ahead? But since Chinese companies are evil at the moment, they are not really being paid attention to.

••

Hendrik@ChickenHenne

4Mo

In my opinion, the state can participate in itself, but it should be investments in strategic topics or in sectors that bring added value for us as a society. AI and robotics, for example, are topics that generally strengthen us as a business location.

I see eVTOL as absolute humbug, where every euro is wasted. The concept doesn't solve any problem that isn't already solved better or more cheaply today. eVTOL cannot do mass transportation because it is too small. It can't do individual transportation either (better) because it requires space for take-off and landing areas similar to today's helicopters and is too exclusive and expensive to compete with cars.

So for me, the whole industry is a toy for and by the super-rich. The state should stay out of it.
But it also explains why the FDP thinks the whole thing is cool --> Exactly their clientele.

••

Participez à la conversation