2Année·

@Kundenservice I think the country distribution is not quite right, is it?

2
9 Commentaires

image de profil
Yes, it looks a bit strange.😅 We'll pass it on to our colleagues for correction.
3
image de profil
@Ch_ris I'm sorry to hear that :) I'll ask again and I think I can give you an answer by Monday :-) I'll have to find out exactly where the problem lies
Utilisateur supprimé
2Année
Le commentaire a été supprimé
image de profil
@California_Dreamin The data is corrected and apparently replaced again with the next database update, as it is assumed that our provider always has the most up-to-date data.

We'll have to see what we can do about this.
@Kundenservice hello getquin team. This ETF seems to be still pulling wrong data for you guys. Please correct this as this is also breaking our country allocation of our portfolios....
@Kundenservice So neither the country breakdown nor the top positions are displayed correctly (at least for me)...
image de profil
@user64efa7b981de47e2 @Ilu92
We have overlooked something crucial:

Synthetic replication, so the swaps are mapped and not the theoretical index.
The issuer presents it in exactly the same way on its website.

After all, a synthetic ETF uses swaps to try to replicate the index return rather than buying the index itself.

https://www.amundietf.de/de/privatanleger/products/equity/amundi-msci-emerging-markets-ucits-etf-eur-c/lu1681045370
Voir une réponse de plus
Nevertheless, the items of the actual index must appear here - after all, the performance, risk and country distribution are based on this. Amundi, for example, also lists the top 10 on its website, starting with TSMC at 7.47%, Samsung at 3.93%, etc. - As an investor, I am more or less indifferent to how the fund reflects the return - what counts for me is the index.
Nothing happened, did it?
Participez à la conversation