Postes
125🔹 $APP (+1,23 %) +7.4%
🔹 $HOOD (-0,67 %) +7.2%
🔹 $EME (+1,73 %) +2.2%
They will replace MarketAxess, Caesars Entertainment and Enphase Energy.
Meanwhile, Caesars fell -0.5%, Enphase -1.8%, and MSTR dropped -3% after disappointment of not being included.
📊 Joining the S&P 500 is a major milestone — it increases demand from ETFs and institutional investors, improves liquidity, and strengthens a company’s market profile.
So 1.5 weeks have now passed. The first gimmicks are over and my Watchlist Pie has returned a total of 4.5% in one week. This has now been sold and I have built up a pie to save for the next 8-10 years. I'm starting with 50€ a week until I've completed the broker's test phase. After that I'll ramp it up to about 1k per month.
There are still a few stocks missing, but the big ones will be scaled down a bit. Among others $IREN (+9,49 %) ....
What do you think of the selection?
$NVDA (+2,44 %)
$GOOGL (-0,15 %)
$MSFT (+0 %)
$AVGO (+8,84 %)
$005930
$AMD (-0,2 %)
$TSLA (+0,46 %)
$IBM (-1,02 %)
$RKLB (-1,25 %)
$NU (+0,23 %)
$SMCI (+0,89 %)
$HIMS (+0,22 %)
$ENR (+3,16 %)
$HOOD (-0,67 %)
$PLTR (+2,14 %)
$CSCO (+1,23 %)
$MTX (+0 %)
$TTD (-11,98 %)
$QBTS (-0,07 %)
$9866 (-8,88 %)
$CRWV (+11,12 %)
And what of course should not be missing is $SIKA (-1,19 %) These are still weighted at 2% 😉 As a craftsman, I really enjoy using the products myself. The technological progress compared to other products such as StoCretec or others is already enormous, but it would go beyond the scope of this article.
$HOOD (-0,67 %) publishes (voluntary) monthly updates. The report for July was published today and is convincing across the board. High trading volumes as a result of increased volatility played $HOOD (-0,67 %) into the cards.
Total platform assets now stand at $298 B, which corresponds to an increase of 108% compared to the previous year.
This rapid growth is also reflected in the share price. YTD is $HOOD (-0,67 %) up 142% for euro investors, and even higher in USD. A P/E ratio of 55 also indicates a high valuation. However, it is well known that the P/E ratio is not the best valuation indicator for growth stocks.
$HOOD (-0,67 %) According to my investment thesis, the US economy will be a major beneficiary of the largest wealth transfer ever in the USA in the coming years, when trillions of USD will be passed on to the next generation. A short to medium term catalyst could be the inclusion in the S&P 500 in September when the next rebalancing takes place.
Are you invested or are you considering $HOOD (-0,67 %) in your portfolio?
A short introduction on my part. I am 26 years old and have been investing for 3-4 years. The last two years I have done a professional training. This now enables me to earn a net salary of around € 3300 to start with. I also have a side business which also earns me around €1000 a month.
Now to the plan I'm pursuing until I'm 30. As you can see from my portfolio, my individual stocks are underperforming the market, although I am convinced of the values in the long term. I will therefore now shift my focus strongly in the direction of ETFs.
Savings plan in the future:
100€ per month in Bitcoin
100€ in a building society saver to get the 70€ housing construction premium per year (is a legacy from 2023 and has a good financing interest rate)
$HOOD (-0,67 %) and $HIMS (+0,22 %) should be saved up to a maximum of €1000 via a savings plan. I think both models are very promising, but I'm aware of the risk involved.
$IWDA (+0,19 %) I want to accumulate around €1800 per month as a core.
So I hope to have around the first €100,000 in my portfolio by then.
This will leave me €2200 to live on, which should be enough for a normal standard of living. Do you think the savings targets are realistic or do you think the 50% savings rate is too extreme?
Cathie Wood's ARK ETFs once again saw significant transactions on Tuesday, August 12, 2025, with a focus on technology and biotech stocks. The largest transaction of the day was the purchase of 738,367 shares of The Trade Desk Inc ( $TTD (-11,98 %) ) with a total value of $39,266,357. This move underscores ARK's continued confidence in the digital advertising platform, where the fund had already significantly increased its positions in recent days.
Another notable transaction involved Block Inc ( $SQ (-2,41 %) ), formerly known as Square. Here ARK sold 215,543 shares, representing a sizable value of $15,741,105. This sale represents one of the larger divestitures of the day and could indicate a strategic realignment of ARK's position towards the financial services and digital payments company.
ARK also made a significant purchase of 643,406 shares of Pinterest Inc ( $PINS ) worth $21,998,051. The social media company has repeatedly been in ARK's focus in the past, as evidenced by the continuous purchases over the past week. This trend points to a bullish assessment of Pinterest's growth prospects on the part of ARK.
In the biotech sector, ARK's ARK ETF purchased 128,896 shares of CRISPR Therapeutics AG ( $CRSP (-2,63 %) ) for a total value of $714,567, continuing its investment in the gene-editing company. On the flip side, various ARK ETFs divested shares of DraftKings Inc ( $DKNG (-0,66 %) ), Guardant Health Inc ( $GH (-4,71 %) ), Robinhood Markets Inc ($HOOD (-0,67 %) ), Palantir Technologies Inc ($PLTR (+2,14 %) ), Roblox Corp ( $RBLX ) and Shopify Inc ($SHOP (-1,18 %) ). The largest sell-off was DraftKings, with 221,203 shares worth $9,452,004 sold.
Other notable buys included Exact Sciences Corp ( $EXAS (-0,32 %) ) and Personalis Inc ( $PSNL (-0,86 %) ). ARK bought 93,753 and 134,035 shares worth $3,835,435 and $603,157 respectively. The continued purchases in these stocks could indicate a focused strategy targeting innovative healthcare companies.
Smaller transactions were also part of the day's activity. ARK bought shares in Compass Pathways PLC ( $CMPS (-2,26 %) ) and 10X Genomics Inc ( $TXG (-7,31 %) ). Despite the smaller dollar amounts, these purchases could be part of a long-term strategy that focuses on up-and-coming companies in the respective sectors.
Some of dear Cathie's transactions don't need to be understood but well, the young lady's returns speak for themselves.
$ARKK (-1,15 %) and $ARKF (-0,58 %) over 70% return since 365 days, I can only shine with +27% with my portfolio.
I will remain invested in $TTD (-11,98 %) My current portfolio has a lot of risk, as I have generated some cash.
At the moment I'm considering whether I should possibly $HMWO (-0,01 %) and $EQQQ (-0,03 %) or just the $VUSA (+0,16 %) into the portfolio.
Temporarily sold $AMD (-0,2 %) +35%, $HIMS (+0,22 %) +15%, $DOCN (-0,07 %) +9%.
I would re-enter Hims and AMD at certain prices and possibly add other companies to the portfolio if they fit my selection.
My positions:
On the watchlist
Robinhood has become my largest position in the portfolio developed 🚀
It was not the perfect entry. It was not the perfect time. And also not the perfect execution of the trade. After all, I sold almost 25% of my position at around € 43 with a profit of +17% 🤡
But it was the right move: $HOOD (-0,67 %) to buy when others were selling!
Today, looking back, it seems obvious that the share price would rise, but three months ago, in the middle of the crash, there was pure panic 📉.
With a growing user base, booming stock and crypto trading and a clear market position, I am more convinced of Robinhood than ever before.
Robinhood has delivered very strong Q2 figures:
📊 Turnover +45 % to 989 million $
💵 Profit doubled to 386 million $
👥 26.5 million customers (+10 % YoY)
💰 279 billion $ Assets under custody (+99 % YoY)
-> This catapulted the share to a new all-time high. And investors are eagerly awaiting the inclusion in the S&P 500. The next rebalancing date is scheduled for September 2025 in September 2025.
What do you think of the share?
*No investment advice, buy or sell recommendation.
#robinhood
#hood
#aktien #aktieninvestment
#aktienhandel
#aktientipps
#aktienanalyse
#börse
#börsenhandel
#investieren
#depot
#finanzen
#finanzielleunabhängigkeit
Modernizing legacy digital infrastructures is never easy, especially for public banks in complex regulatory environments. However, Banco Nacion has proven that it is possible with the right partner.
By partnering with Galileo and using Cyberbank Digital, the bank has been able to achieve measurable results:
- 25% growth in new corporate customers
- Reduced service delivery time from months to just four days
- Significant reduction in operating costs
- Standardized, future-proof digital infrastructure that enables innovation on a large scale
Learn more about the partnership:
Cyberbank Core became an integral part of Galileo's offering following the acquisition of Technisys by SoFi in 2022 . Galileo is a subsidiary of SoFi 🚀
Galileo is a technology platform specializing in payment processing services and other Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) solutions for fintech companies, banks and brands. The acquisition of Galileo allowed SoFi to expand its own consumer products and services while operating Galileo as a standalone subsidiary. Galileo provides SoFi with an infrastructure to innovate faster and deliver a broader range of capabilities to its customers.
More Galileo customers in case you didn't knowT : $HOOD (-0,67 %)
$DAVE
$TOST (-2,37 %)
$WH (-3,36 %) ✌️
The price/sales ratio (P/S) relative to sales growth is a one-dimensional view, but nevertheless provides a good initial overview:
Table = sorted in descending order by market capitalization
Which companies do you see as having the greatest potential in the next 5 years?
Quick info: The following text is an AI-corrected translation from English. Some people may not like it, just don't read it, for everyone else this is the beginning of an exciting text.
For those in a hurry: The most important points in a nutshell
Revenue and growth: The Base network has proven to be an impressive source of revenue. In its first year alone, the platform generated around $74.4 million in revenue, mainly from so-called "sequencer fees" that users pay for transactions. Driven by exponential growth in user activity, Base has become one of the leading networks of its kind.
Base: Coinbase's strategic on-chain initiative
After several months of testing and development, Base officially launched its public mainnet on August 9, 2023.
Technically speaking, Base is a "layer 2 scaling solution" for Ethereum that builds on Optimism's open-source OP stack. As a so-called "optimistic rollup", Base processes transactions bundled away from the Ethereum main blockchain and only passes on a compressed summary to it. This architecture allows Base to inherit the robust security and decentralization of Ethereum while offering users significantly faster and cheaper transactions.
This positioning makes Base a strategic stroke of genius for its parent company Coinbase. The rise of efficient Layer 2 networks and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) poses a long-term threat to the business model of centralized exchanges (CEXs) like Coinbase. Coinbase is proactively addressing this threat by launching its own L2 network. Instead of losing users to external on-chain ecosystems, the company is channeling them into an environment that it operates and controls itself. This is a defensive maneuver to protect its core business while opening up new revenue streams.
The business model of a Layer 2 sequencer
Base's profitability is based on the fundamental role the network plays as a layer-2 sequencer. In this function, Coinbase operates the node that sorts and bundles user transactions and transmits them to the Ethereum blockchain. This results in a clear business model with defined revenue streams and cost factors.
The revenue comes from the fees that users pay for processing their transactions. Each fee on Base is made up of two parts:
The L2 fee (execution fee), which remunerates the sequencer for the computing power on the Base network itself.
The L1 fee (security fee), which covers the estimated costs incurred by the sequencer for publishing the data on the Ethereum mainnet.
The sum of both components is the total fee for the user and represents the gross revenue for Base. A key element is the EIP-1559-based fee market, which allows users to voluntarily pay a "tip" (priority fee). In times of high network utilization, they can thus have their transaction brought forward.
The costs, or more precisely the "cost of sales", consist almost exclusively of the fees that Base has to pay to the Ethereum network for data storage and processing. These expenses are incurred when the sequencer publishes the bundled L2 transaction data on the L1 blockchain, anchoring the state of the Base network to the security of Ethereum.
This results in a simple formula for on-chain profitability:
Gross profit = total revenue (all user fees) - L1 data and security costs
Gross margin = gross profit / total revenue
This model creates a powerful economic feedback loop. If the demand for transactions on Base increases, for example due to a popular new app or high trading activity, there is competition for the scarce space in the blocks. Users who benefit most from fast execution are willing to pay higher priority fees. This bidding process directly drives up the sequencer's revenue. Base's revenue thus grows in proportion to the demand and economic value of the activities taking place on the network.
Financial performance over time
Q3 2023: Immediately after its launch in August, Base quickly gained momentum through the "Onchain Summer" marketing campaign and viral apps such as friend.tech. This initial phase created a solid base of user activity and revenue.
Q4 2023 & Q1 2024: The network saw steady organic growth in users and transaction volume, leading to a continuous increase in quarterly revenue.
Q2 2024: This quarter marked a turning point. After the Dencun upgrade, Base's L1 costs plummeted. Coinbase passed these savings almost entirely on to users in the form of drastically reduced fees. The result: despite a massive increase in transaction volume, the average revenue per transaction fell sharply, leading to a temporary dip in total revenue.
Q3 & Q4 2024: The strategy of prioritizing user growth over short-term profits began to pay off. The sheer scale of the transaction volume compensated for the lower revenue per transaction. The Coinbase report for Q4 2024 reported an impressive 99% quarter-on-quarter increase in "other transaction revenue" to $68 million, "largely driven by higher sequencer revenue on Base".
Q1 2025: The trend of massive transaction volume continued. However, Coinbase's Q1 2025 shareholder letter pointed out that the average revenue per transaction on Base decreased by 21% compared to the previous quarter. This shows that intense competition and network optimizations continue to push fees down, even as overall activity grows.
Aggregated on-chain data from Token Terminal summarizes this development: In the 365-day period from the end of July 2024 to the end of July 2025, the base network generated total revenue of $74.4 million.
Cost dynamics: the dencun effect
The expense side of the Base balance sheet is dominated by a single item: the cost of securing on Ethereum L1. And this item was structurally and permanently redesigned in March 2024.
Before the Dencun upgrade, Base, like other rollups, used a data field called "calldata" to send its transaction data to Ethereum. This method was secure but expensive, as L2s had to compete for scarce storage space with all other Ethereum transactions. In February 2024, for example, these costs amounted to a considerable $3.8 million for Base.
The Ethereum Dencun upgrade on March 13, 2024 introduced a revolution with EIP-4844 (proto-thanksharding). It created an entirely new, separate data market for L2s through a data structure called "blobs". Blobs are specifically designed for this purpose and are therefore dramatically cheaper than call data.
The effect was immediate and profound. L1 security costs became, as one analysis aptly put it, "virtually insignificant". Data shows that the cost for Base to post its data to Ethereum for the entire month of August 2024 was less than $11,000 - a world of difference from the millions of dollars per month before Dencun. A comprehensive analysis by L2BEAT for the full year (July 31, 2024 to July 30, 2025) puts Base's total L1 cost at just $4.93 million.
This combination of revenue and transformed cost structure has led to a dynamic profitability development. As of September 11, 2024, the Base network had generated a cumulative on-chain gross profit of $53.63 million since its launch, confirming the underlying profitability of the operation.
The profit margin trend tells an even finer story. A Galaxy Digital report comparing the 150 days before and after Dencun provides clear numbers:
Pre-Dencun: Optimistic rollups like Base were operating at an average gross margin of 22.65%.
After Dencun: This margin exploded to 92.3%.
This quadrupling of the margin is the direct result of collapsed L1 costs while retaining a portion of user fees.
Economics for the end user: What does a transaction cost?
Between its launch in August 2023 and the Dencun upgrade in March 2024, Base already offered a significant cost saving over Ethereum, but the fees were still noticeable for users. The average transaction fee was around $0.50, more complex actions such as a token swap could cost around $1.00.
Dencun was a game changer here too. As the cost of the base sequencer plummeted, this saving could be passed on directly to users. The change was drastic:
After Dencun, median gas fees on Base dropped into the $0.005 range.
A token exchange on an exchange like Uniswap, which previously cost a dollar, was now possible for $0.0018 to $0.05.
A simple transfer of ETH now only costs around $0.004.
Conclusion and outlook: Base compared to the traditional financial world
The analysis of the on-chain data leads to a clear conclusion: the Base network is an undeniably profitable on-chain company. The Dencun upgrade was the decisive event that enabled a strategic realignment: short-term profits were deliberately sacrificed in order to lay a foundation for long-term, sustainable growth through radical fee reductions.
To understand the scope of this development, it is worth making a comparison with everyday financial transactions.
Round 1: Base vs. share trading
Share trading has become much cheaper in recent years, but "free" trading often comes with a catch.
In Europe: Investors are often faced with a mixture of flat fees and percentage costs. A broker like Trade Republic charges a flat fee of €1 per transaction. For an investor who invests €100, this fee means that 1% of their capital is lost from the outset. For smaller, frequent trades, this quickly becomes expensive.
In the USA: Large online brokers advertise with $0 commissions. However, hidden costs can also arise here due to order forwarding (payment for order flow).
The verdict: For a simple share purchase, modern brokers are competitive. But a minimum fee of €1 is literally hundreds, if not thousands of times more expensive than the sub-cent fees on Base.
Round 2: Base vs. international money transfers
SEPA vs. World: Within the European Payments Area (SEPA), euro transfers are often free. However, as soon as currencies are exchanged or money is sent outside this zone, the costs explode. Banks often charge 3-4 % in hidden surcharges and fees. A transfer from a non-euro EU country such as Bulgaria can quickly cost €20.
Fintechs & banks: Even modern services like Wise, which are significantly cheaper, usually charge a percentage (often 0.3 % to 1 %). For a transfer of $1,000, that's still $3 to $10. A traditional international transfer with a major bank often costs $45 to $50.
The verdict: There is no competition here. A simple transfer on Base costs around $0.005. Compared to a $45 bank transfer, the savings are astronomical. Base offers the efficiency of a SEPA transfer, but on a global, currency-independent level.
The microtransaction revolution and financial inclusion.
Saving a few euros on a transaction is already very good, but the real revolution of these near-zero costs lies in the new possibilities they open up.
The era of microtransactions: When a transaction costs less than a penny, it suddenly becomes possible to tip a content creator a few cents, buy an in-game item for a small amount or pay for a single item online without having to take out a subscription. This opens up completely new business models for the digital economy.
True financial inclusion: For people in developing countries, a transaction fee of $ 1- 10 can be a significant barrier. A fee of two cents is not. This radical affordability allows anyone with an internet connection to participate in the global financial system.
$COIN (-0,04 %)
$CRCL (-3,33 %)
$HOOD (-0,67 %)
$ETH (+1,51 %)
$OP (+3,1 %)
$UNI (+2,68 %)
Meilleurs créateurs cette semaine
