LoginSignup
Imagen de perfil
Dominic
@BregisMoon
1Año·
2
6 Comentarios
Imagen de perfil
RealMichaelScott@RealMichaelScott
1Año
It may be true that they are valued much more favorably. The question that should always be asked is: why? One answer could be the high debts that weigh on the company. EBIT of about $900 million is offset by net debt of almost $6 billion. On top of that, it is the smallest player in the industrial gas oligopoly. The risks are simply greater than for the other three companies.
•
6
•
Usuario eliminado
1Año
Comentario eliminado
Imagen de perfil
RealMichaelScott@RealMichaelScott
1Año
@Boarkeinname Firstly, who else do they want to take over in a market that is virtually controlled by four companies? Secondly, they would probably have to take on new debt and that would not be so advantageous at the current level of debt.
••
Ver una respuesta más
Imagen de perfil
Dominic@BregisMoon
1Año
Just wanted to say: 72% YtD performance 😜
•
1
•
Imagen de perfil
Hannes@Hannes_SK
1Año
Valued much more favorably as they are de facto irrelevant. Even in the Far East, Linde and Air Liquide dominate. The company's only notable achievement was the acquisition of Praxair's production facilities in the merger. 😅
••
Imagen de perfil
CD@Carpe-Diem
1Año
.I prefer to think of local or regional big players in the energy sector rather than global ones.
••
Únase a la conversación
InscríbaseInicio de sesión