8Lun·

Fidelity Global Quality Income ETF - debate on position.

Hi all, I'm keen to understand your thoughts on the following. When would you consider $FGEQ (+0,09 %) instead of $VWRL (+0,61 %) as the core of a portfolio? What would be the benefit of one above the other? I used to have $VWRL (+0,61 %) as core, but have switched over to $FGEQ (+0,09 %) with $TDIV (-0,73 %) on the side and a little of $IAPD (-0,08 %) .


I know they track different indexes, as $FGEQ (+0,09 %) track high quality companies from developed markets, while $VWRL (+0,61 %) tracks stocks from both developed and emerging countries.

$FGEQ (+0,09 %) while lacking emerging countries, still has decent growth.


Would you consider $FGEQ (+0,09 %) vs $GGRP (+0,3 %) or go for a more quality oriented ETF such as $IS3R (+0,08 %) to try to grab a little more return?


I'm reconsidering my positions and wondering if I should move some of them around and/or back to where they came from. I've done some DYOR, which has for now lead me to the conclusion to keep $FGEQ (+0,09 %) as the main position and expand a bit into $IS3R (+0,08 %) on the side.


Wondering what your thoughts are :)

8
3 Comentarios

Imagen de perfil
I‘m having both. Even added further ETF to get a monthly dividend and still get nice growth
5
Ver todas las 2 respuestas adicionales
Únase a la conversación