No se ha encontrado

Misan T. · 2024-03-08T11:00:18.399744Z

Ich bespare zu großen Teilen den $ISAC TER Kosten des $FTWG sind jedoch um 0,05% geringer. Wäre er für euch eine Alternative, auch wenn er relativ neu dabei und (noch ein) geringeres fondsvolumem hat?

Misan T.

@Misantrophe

10Lun·

I largely cover the $ISAC (+0,37 %)

TER costs of the $FTWG (+0,38 %) are 0.05% lower, however. Would it be an alternative for you, even if it is relatively new and (still) has a lower fund volume?

6 Comentarios

Kevin E.@KevinE

10Lun

I wouldn't switch because I already have profits on my ETF and these would have to be taxed. However, there is nothing wrong with setting up a new savings plan.

•

Vince von Financial Independence@Financial_Independence

9Lun

Sure, it pays off in the long term. I would simply stop the one ETF savings plan and leave it and go into the cheaper product. Invesco FTSE All World is a good product.

•

Misan T.@Misantrophe

9Lun

@Financial_Independence thanks, that's what I've done for now. Leave it all for now :D especially as you keep coming across new alternatives $WEBG for example is also new and only has ter of 0.07%

••

Wladzko@richchemist

3Lun

@Misantrophe look not only at the TER, but also at the tracking difference (TD).

••

Vince von Financial Independence@Financial_Independence

8Lun

Would simply stop one savings plan and then save in the FTWG

••

ETFKing@ETFKing

6Lun

My tip:
Don't just pay attention to the TER. Factors such as e.g. tracking error could become a yield erosion factor that quickly offset the TER difference. In the case of the Invesco ETFs, due to their short existence and the still manageable volume, I think it is still too early to form a final opinion.

••