1Año·

My strategy of investing parts of the dividends in the weaker stocks to "subsidize" them is working. Today, I was able to put the extra $GOOGL (-0,17 %) off. Alphabet(A) has now moved up to the middle of my portfolio and no longer needs any support.


Now only the normal monthly savings plan amount flows into the title as with all other savings plans. From the freed up funds now gets $GIS (-0,12 %) an additional prop. Incidentally, the savings plan for this title is serviced exclusively from dividends.


It's a great feeling that 4 stocks in my portfolio are not being saved from net pay, but only from reinvested dividends. I would never have imagined that 3 years ago. Ergo: Always stay tuned so that the snowball gets bigger and bigger.


And the recently purchased stock $CPB (-1,42 %) will be added to the series of savings plans. I firmly believe in my soup (and soon) pasta sauce maker, which will continue to contribute to my cash flow.


I wish you a sunny trading day.

7
7 Comentarios

Imagen de perfil
In one sentence: You take care of rebalancing.
5
Imagen de perfil
@randomdude Yes, if you only take into account the repurchasing. (Not the selling)
Imagen de perfil
Interesting strategy! 👍 If you mean weaker with "undervalued" from your point of view, it fits. Would only be careful not to forget the check to not from strategy loyalty to continue to unnecessarily shoot money in losers.
1
Imagen de perfil
Why do you buy the weak with the performance of the strong? I would do it the other way around.
Imagen de perfil
@NiMe to get the weaker ones back to the front. And later, others fall behind who get more. But your thought is just as feasible.
Imagen de perfil
@frugalfreisein ok. usually the weak ones always run weaker than the strong ones.
1
Imagen de perfil
@NiMe as the saying goes - strengthen strengths, weaken weaknesses - I like your approach better too!
Únase a la conversación