A question of pure curiosity
It's funny that all those who now
submissively call for Nord Stream
Stream 2 and tough sanctions
against Russia,
have never demanded anything similar against the USA
when they were illegally involved in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yugoslavia, Yemen,
Libya brought death and destruction and devastated these countries.
devastated these countries, just to name a few
What is your opinion???? And please stay professional
It's funny that all those who now
submissively call for Nord Stream
Stream 2 and tough sanctions
against Russia,
have never demanded anything similar against the USA
when they were illegally involved in
Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Yugoslavia, Yemen,
Libya brought death and destruction and devastated these countries.
devastated these countries, just to name a few
What is your opinion???? And please stay professional
•
7676
•Usuario eliminado
2Año
Comentario eliminado
@LeipzigForEver I only joined in 2018, so I can't say for myself how I would have acted after 9/11 etc. The bottom line is that I understand the criticism of the USA, but I opt for the "lesser evil" and therefore for the West and against Russia/China (remaining Chinese positions will soon be divested). Moreover, for me personally, there is a difference between invading a sovereign state and threatening it with nuclear weapons and intervening in the Middle East, such as in the Gulf War or the Afghanistan mission.
•
99
•Usuario eliminado
2Año
2Año
@LeipzigForEver the USA only sends peace makers 😂
••
@Gluecksritter the same everywhere so many fanboys 😂
••
Usuario eliminado
2Año
Comentario eliminado
2Año
@LeipzigForEver or the NATO that had bombed Belgrade
•
22
•
2Año
@LeipzigForEver - Your apple and pear comparison in all honor: https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Militäroperationen_Russlands_und_der_Sowjetunion
Just because Putin has, admittedly, been more skillful than the USA in his operations, often using mercenaries alone (Wagner google it) or dual (dirty work = mercenaries / glorious victory with flag on tank), Russian wars are and have always been much more victim-heavy. Aleppo was completely bombed by the Russians, thousands of civilian victims accepted from the start.
Just take a look at the Arte documentary: https://youtu.be/cUxfZtxcujk
It was produced and broadcast before the war, so it is very neutral.
Just because Putin has, admittedly, been more skillful than the USA in his operations, often using mercenaries alone (Wagner google it) or dual (dirty work = mercenaries / glorious victory with flag on tank), Russian wars are and have always been much more victim-heavy. Aleppo was completely bombed by the Russians, thousands of civilian victims accepted from the start.
Just take a look at the Arte documentary: https://youtu.be/cUxfZtxcujk
It was produced and broadcast before the war, so it is very neutral.
•
88
•@Gluecksritter
BAIZUO
PRONOUNCED ",BEI-TSUA"
.IS A CHINESE TERM FOR A SUPPOSEDLY
SUPPOSEDLY EDUCATED, BUT VERY NAIVE
PEOPLE FROM THE WEST WHO
FOR PEACE, EQUALITY AND AGAINST RACISM
RACISM, BUT DOES SO NOT FOR THE SAKE OF
FOR THE SAKE OF IT, BUT SIMPLY IN ORDER TO
FEELING OF MORAL SUPERIORITY
SATISFACTION. A BAIZUO ONLY CARES
ONLY CONCERNS HIMSELF WITH ISSUES WHERE
CAN EASILY EARN SOCIAL APPLAUSE IN THE WEST
CAN BE EARNED (SUCH AS IMMIGRATION,
MIGRATION, LGBT, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE) AND
GEOPOLITICAL, HISTORICAL AND DEEPER CONTEXTS.
DEEPER CONTEXTS.
THIS IS USUALLY DONE OUT OF IGNORANCE,
BUT OFTEN ALSO OUT OF FEAR OF LOSING THE PATH OF
(SUPPOSED) POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
AND THUS ALSO TO LOSE THE
SOCIAL APPLAUSE FOR HIS FREE
FREE ENGAGEMENT.
BAIZUO
PRONOUNCED ",BEI-TSUA"
.IS A CHINESE TERM FOR A SUPPOSEDLY
SUPPOSEDLY EDUCATED, BUT VERY NAIVE
PEOPLE FROM THE WEST WHO
FOR PEACE, EQUALITY AND AGAINST RACISM
RACISM, BUT DOES SO NOT FOR THE SAKE OF
FOR THE SAKE OF IT, BUT SIMPLY IN ORDER TO
FEELING OF MORAL SUPERIORITY
SATISFACTION. A BAIZUO ONLY CARES
ONLY CONCERNS HIMSELF WITH ISSUES WHERE
CAN EASILY EARN SOCIAL APPLAUSE IN THE WEST
CAN BE EARNED (SUCH AS IMMIGRATION,
MIGRATION, LGBT, ENVIRONMENT, CLIMATE CHANGE) AND
GEOPOLITICAL, HISTORICAL AND DEEPER CONTEXTS.
DEEPER CONTEXTS.
THIS IS USUALLY DONE OUT OF IGNORANCE,
BUT OFTEN ALSO OUT OF FEAR OF LOSING THE PATH OF
(SUPPOSED) POLITICAL CORRECTNESS
AND THUS ALSO TO LOSE THE
SOCIAL APPLAUSE FOR HIS FREE
FREE ENGAGEMENT.
•
22
•Usuario eliminado
2Año
Comentario eliminado