The enemy of the best is often the good.
I have these ETFs in my portfolio:
Some, if not all, have outperformed the MSCI World at times.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At the moment they are all about the same weighting and should be increased further. While I am trying to implement a growth strategy with equities, these ETFs are intended to generate passive income.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Objectively speaking, I would have to sell the $FUSD (+0,76 %) as it further increases the US share and overlaps heavily with at least two of the other ETFs. In other words, it reduces diversification in all respects.
But on the other hand $FUSD (+0,76 %) also the one with the best past return and will probably remain so in the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One approach could be to take the US weighting and overlaps into account in the ETF weighting of the portfolio and implement it as follows, for example:
$TDIV (+0,59 %) 40%
$GGRP (+0,8 %) 30%
$FGEQ (+0,47 %) 15%
$FUSD (+0,76 %) 15%
If the ETFs were weighted in this way, the following allocations would result:
Countries/Regions:
USA 56.4%
Canada 4.4%
Europe 33.2%
Asia 5.4%
Top 10 weighting:
$VZ (+1,42 %) 2,3%
$CVX (+0,88 %) 2,1%
$NVDA (+1,51 %) 1,9%
$PFE (+1,18 %) 1,7%
$HSBA (+0,37 %) 1,6%
$IBM (+4,22 %) 1,4%
$AVGO (+1,3 %) 1,4%
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What do you think of this allocation example? Do you have any suggestions for improvement or comments?
