Climate capitalists instead of climate gluts?
Through a story about the $TEAM founder who holds 11% of $AGL (+2,91 %) holds to force a transformation at the energy provider from coal to green energy generation, the idea of "democratic activist investments" came to you. [A]
The idea behind this is to get a mass of small investors to buy shares in companies whose climate technology is not to their liking through a coordinated platform. This platform would also check the verification of the ownership of the shares.
Of course, it depends on the underlying shareholder structure of the respective company whether changes are enforceable at all. As an example $GOOGL (+0,99 %) and $META (+3,24 %) you have no chance at all, since the unavailable "power shares" clearly outvote the normal ones. Apart from that, the market caps are perhaps a bit too big.
In general, instead of vandalism and coercion, I am interested in using the means of capitalism itself instead of fighting against it.
The state should also allow the population to make decisions about existing and possible investments. Because with it excuses can be avoided like:
"I don't have the money to buy shares".
"Creating a portfolio is too much work for me".
Whether decisions are exclusively made this way is questionable. Also, such referendums should rather be carried out via a digital and reformed way, as the new elections in Berlin show 🙄
The ideas are certainly not new, but I don't understand why they are not seen more as a way to reach climate goals for 2030. Not only would it be a healthy and sensible way to introduce people to stocks/capitalism, it would also be a way to enact feelings of control and participation in times of uncertainty, fear and powerlessness brought on by the common crisis of climate change.
Also, these new climate capitalists should create startups that address organized problems and unite that with capitalism. And all this in addition to appropriate demonstrations and actions. They seem to be very good at networking and organizing. So why not do it that way?
The new generations are very aware of the power they have and that is good. They are the workforce of tomorrow and know that health and time are more valuable than slaving away for a pension that comes from a ponzi scheme or doing a job that gives them no deeper meaning. And it is not unimportant to create perspectives by pursuing climate goals.
Who knows, maybe getquin will build a white-label solution that enables this co-determination and thus becomes profitable with state subsidies 👀 After all, isn't co-determination the QUINTessence of democracy?
And couldn't it be done for the future of all, instead of again for the addition of $GOOGL (+0,99 %) into a depot of some Uli, who only drives anyway @RoronoaZoro in the madness drives?
Anyway, enough with the questions now.
Who has read up to here, can tell me with pleasure his favorite Christmas pastry. Likewise, I would also find your ideas interesting 👀
Enjoy your weekend and kiss on the nut🚀
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2022/11/03/atlassian-team-q1-2023.html [A]
