Why did you choose these particular securities?
With ETFs in particular, you would probably be better off with a $IWDA, even if the distributing variant offers a better return.
$VAR I wouldn't be interested in an ETF with negative cash flow just to be able to pay dividends.
$HAUTO I don't know enough myself.
With ETFs in particular, you would probably be better off with a $IWDA, even if the distributing variant offers a better return.
$VAR I wouldn't be interested in an ETF with negative cash flow just to be able to pay dividends.
$HAUTO I don't know enough myself.
•
33
•@Staatsmann My analysis for the selection of these ETFs was:
$CSPX and $EXXT: growth component, as these tend to outperform the global index. I want to avoid too much risk, so I didn't just choose $EXXT.
$TDIV As a counterbalance to the strongly US and technology-oriented stocks of $CSPX and $EXXT, this ETF contains more industrial and European companies.
$SDHY - Some diversification with bonds, also good dividends.
$O - Some diversification with real estate, plus monthly dividends, which are a good way to keep you motivated at the beginning.
$VAR - Some diversification with the energy sector, also good dividends. I used to be based in Norway, so I have some bias towards Norwegian companies as I know them (but obviously not their financials as I didn't know about the negative cash flow). But I agree that this doesn't seem to be too good.
$HAUTO - Mainly dividend related, but the company also seems to have a good growth path.
Would you say this thought process makes sense? I'm a complete novice when it comes to investing :)
Or would it be best to just stick with $IWDA and get rid of all other securities.
$CSPX and $EXXT: growth component, as these tend to outperform the global index. I want to avoid too much risk, so I didn't just choose $EXXT.
$TDIV As a counterbalance to the strongly US and technology-oriented stocks of $CSPX and $EXXT, this ETF contains more industrial and European companies.
$SDHY - Some diversification with bonds, also good dividends.
$O - Some diversification with real estate, plus monthly dividends, which are a good way to keep you motivated at the beginning.
$VAR - Some diversification with the energy sector, also good dividends. I used to be based in Norway, so I have some bias towards Norwegian companies as I know them (but obviously not their financials as I didn't know about the negative cash flow). But I agree that this doesn't seem to be too good.
$HAUTO - Mainly dividend related, but the company also seems to have a good growth path.
Would you say this thought process makes sense? I'm a complete novice when it comes to investing :)
Or would it be best to just stick with $IWDA and get rid of all other securities.
••