6Lun
You want to "diversify as much as possible" - and yet you only invest in a single asset class that is also highly correlated? How does that fit?
••
@Epi diversifying with the etfs was the original idea. However, as US tech stocks have exploded in recent years, I have invested significantly more in them in the hope that they will outperform the msci world over the next 5-10 years. The fact that the shares correlate with each other was really not very clever of me. But I still think that the risk is still limited.
••
6Lun
@Diamondhandzz Well, the long-term statistics on mean reversion, valuation levels, debt ratio, equity ratio etc. are all going against you and your strategy.
But as we all know, hope dies last. 🤷
But as we all know, hope dies last. 🤷
••
@Epi So you think it would be better if I switched my entire portfolio into etfs? Along the lines of what I wrote at the beginning?
••
6Lun
@[Diamondhandzz](Diamondhandzz) I think it would be better to diversify the portfolio as much as possible if you want to diversify it as much as possible.
At the moment I would give the diversification maybe 3/10 because you have diversified to some extent within the stocks (the individual stocks of course reduce the diversification significantly again), but not between the asset classes.
With the proposed reallocation you will bring the portfolio to 4/10, max. 5/10.
At the moment I would give the diversification maybe 3/10 because you have diversified to some extent within the stocks (the individual stocks of course reduce the diversification significantly again), but not between the asset classes.
With the proposed reallocation you will bring the portfolio to 4/10, max. 5/10.
••