LoginSignup
J
@Draqua1
1Año·
2
13 Comentarios
Imagen de perfil
Linus@Kapitalismuspur
1Año
None at all.
•
12
•
Imagen de perfil
Scobra@S-C-O-B-R-A
1Año
Main Street Capital
•
9
•
Imagen de perfil
Ronald@AlterMann
1Año
Take a look at Aktienfinder.net
•
3
•
Imagen de perfil
Kai@Dividenden-Sammler
1Año
would prefer $PM instead of $MO
•
1
•
Imagen de perfil
CrashBurner@Psychedelic_Sunflower
1Año
If you are not yet retired or about to retire, none at all.
••
J@Draqua1
1Año
••
Imagen de perfil
CrashBurner@Psychedelic_Sunflower
1Año
What do you want with high dividends at a young age? If you use them to cover running costs, you are ruining the compound interest effect.
If you reinvest them, that is of course better, but you pay a lot of taxes, which is money that no longer works for you over time and greatly reduces the compound interest effect. In addition, the share price performance of companies with a high dividend yield tends to be moderate. In retirement, this cash flow would be exactly what you need to cover running costs and expenses, and then you would also pay a lot of taxes, but only later in life when your money has already worked hard for you.

If you still have a long investment horizon, opt for a mix of shares with strong price growth potential and high dividend growth.

Why? Many strong companies only have very low dividend yields of well below <1%, but regularly increase their dividends in the high single-digit to low double-digit range. If you now hold such a share for 20 years, you will still have a considerable personal dividend yield due to your low entry price. If you have any doubts, calculate your dividend yield for Apple shares, for example, which you would have bought 20 years ago. The share price back then was around 1 dollar, today the annual dividend is also 1 dollar. That's a 100% annual return, and rising! In addition, there are huge capital gains that you could still realize in old age and switch to a dividend share if the cash flow is not enough for you. You'll get significantly more cash flow out of it, even if this dividend share has made 200% over the 20 years. I mean, in the best case scenario, you will have increased your capital a hundredfold in that time. Apple is of course also a blatant example, but you will also see similar things with other companies.

The point is that companies that are able to regularly increase their dividends significantly are more likely to perform strongly and have the potential to grow further, as they do not spend a large part of their free cash flow on distributions to shareholders, but usually spend this money wisely on research and development and acquisitions, thus creating much greater added value for the shareholder.

You can do this by investing in high-dividend stocks, but be aware that this will most likely cost you returns, and not a little.
•
2
•
Imagen de perfil
PeterGriffin_@PeterGriffin_
1Año
•
2
•
Imagen de perfil
Dividendensammler@DividendensammIer
1Año
Take a look at my portfolio, some things are currently exciting. E.g. Diageo, nestle
••
Imagen de perfil
Barsten@Barsten
1Año
None of them.
••
Imagen de perfil
Smudo@Smudeo
1Año
••
Barren W.@Barren_Wuffett
1Año
••
Imagen de perfil
Wachstums_Aktionär@schokosahne
1Año
None, all influencer stocks and absolutely indebted and their market is in decline.

So you're just taking risk, you're a private investor, you want the maximum return without much risk
••
Únase a la conversación
InscríbaseInicio de sesión