Imagen de perfil
1Año
Hey, I'm not sure if you've picked up on the point of stock returns correctly. In the factsheets, the dividend is meant, I assume. If you then still prefer the accumulating you should rather orient yourself on the price developments p.a. At first glance, both have a similar approach.
1
Imagen de perfil
@VP
Yes with share yield is the dividend meant. Since both are the accumulating variant, the higher share yield (dividend) should ensure that more shares are bought accumulating than the other. If the price would not give each other much, the normal with the better diversification would be the favorite.

What I had seen 3 years in retrospect, was that the "normal" came better through the circles, but the other with the high dividend payers has caught up strongly and both are almost on the same. So the question would be who thinks which could run better in the future and why he thinks so.
Imagen de perfil
@DividendenSchwabe The hope that the high dividend yield will catch up does not work out in any case. High dividends have always been bad for company and share price performance. The share of utilities, for example, in this fund will be relatively high, and they did well last year for well-known reasons. But that will not continue.
2
Imagen de perfil
@DividendenSchwabe and the thauser does not buy shares, the value of the shares simply increases.
1
Imagen de perfil
I don't quite understand the point of a therausierende High Dividend Yield Etfs. High dividends come from companies that can't do anything better with their capital, i.e. don't see any meaningful growth opportunity. Can be invested if you want to generate regular income. But due to the reinvestment of dividends, this is not the case. I would take the AllWorld, is easier to understand.
1