Even if it is annoying, you should/will not suffer any loss. So it just depends on what it is. If it's similar to Reits with the correction, then it may be that you received too much a quarter or a year ago and you've actually had €4 too much since then.
It's important that you take a close look at the statement. Firstly, it should say exactly what it is and secondly, the amounts should have been paid with the same value date. This is the point from which the calculation starts.
And then, of course, it depends on whether you receive a credit note in a few days/weeks that offsets this again. Again, pay attention to the value date.
Although TR's answer is a bit casual and should not be formulated in this way, it may well be correct.
The broker only receives a message about what he has to do. This is then carried out. No questions are asked as to why or why not. Especially as they often don't get this information either.
And why should a broker (no matter which one) ask the company why there was a correction?
It's just the way it is, that's it. They have no capacity for this and no direct connections anyway.
It's important that you take a close look at the statement. Firstly, it should say exactly what it is and secondly, the amounts should have been paid with the same value date. This is the point from which the calculation starts.
And then, of course, it depends on whether you receive a credit note in a few days/weeks that offsets this again. Again, pay attention to the value date.
Although TR's answer is a bit casual and should not be formulated in this way, it may well be correct.
The broker only receives a message about what he has to do. This is then carried out. No questions are asked as to why or why not. Especially as they often don't get this information either.
And why should a broker (no matter which one) ask the company why there was a correction?
It's just the way it is, that's it. They have no capacity for this and no direct connections anyway.
•
33
•
5Lun
@DividendenWaschbaer The corrections for REITS that you are referring to are always caused by the custodian bank when errors have occurred in tax settlements. At Scalable, this regularly occurs with O. However, you can and must be able to trace the transactions and reversals from document references, which is usually the case. TR's customer service has not distinguished itself positively here. If in doubt, report it to the ombudsman's office...they collect it...I hear that banks are sometimes regulated after all.🤣
••