I compared 4 ETFs that track the world's most famous index : MSCI World
- Xtrackers MSCI World UCITS ETF $XDWD (+1,27 %) o
- iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF $IWDA (+1,17 %) o SWDA
- SPDR MSCI World UCITS ETF $SPPW (+1,2 %) o SWRD
- Amundi MSCI World V UCITS ETF Acc $LCUW (+1,26 %) o LCWD
- Xtrackers TER of 0.19% + 0.01 transaction =0.2%
- iShares with the TER 0.2% + 0% transaction = 2%
- SPDR with the TER 0.12% + 0% transaction = 0.12%
- Amundi with the TER 0.12% + 0.04 of transaction = 0.16%
Over 3 years they have returned
- SPDR 39.42%
- iShares 38.76%
- Xtrackers 38.72%
- Amundi 37.48%
The different costs can already be seen after only 3 years.
On paper the best looks like SPPW--what do you think ?
Compared to Amundi (the second cheapest) gained 2% over 3 years difference.
From 2019 the difference between the 2 increases by almost a 4% from 96.02% vs 92.69%
Another difference between the 2 is the mode of replication Sampling (Participations
1,449) vs Total Replication (Holdings 1,459).
I don't think 10 companies out of almost 1,500 make such a big difference in performance.
What do you think ?
